Subject Week 12 | Feedback
Link to Teachers' Standards:
Standard 1 - setting high expectations
Standard 2 - promoting good progress
Standard 3 - demonstrating good subject and curriculum knowledge
Standard 4 - planning and teaching well structured lessons
Standard 5 - adapting your teaching
Standard 6 - making accurate and productive use of assessment
Standard 7 - managing behaviour
Step 1: Watch Video
Step 2: Read Evidence Summary
1. Teaching Challenge
Mr Jones assesses pupils’ work regularly and adapts his teaching in response to their needs. He wants to ensure that the feedback he offers pupils genuinely helps them to improve their work and deepen their understanding. He finds the variety of kinds of feedback available overwhelming and he worries that the amount of time it will take him to provide detailed feedback will be unsustainable in the long term.
2. Key Idea
Feedback can make a significant difference to pupils’ understanding and outcomes if it guides pupils to improve and is sustainable for the teacher.
3. Effective feedback is specific, usable and encouraging
Mr Jones must ensure that his feedback offers pupils precise guidance about how they can improve. Often feedback focuses on the immediate task, but it is more helpful to link feedback about the immediate task to feedback about the subject or the process of learning. This ensures that pupils can apply it to future tasks (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). Feedback should provide specific guidance in how pupils improve their work: lengthy, complicated and excessively detailed feedback can be overwhelming to pupils and therefore counter-productive since they may be unable to act upon it (DFE, 2016).
Ensuring pupils respond to feedback is as important as the content of the feedback (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). Feedback may be ineffective if pupils find it discouraging or conclude that they are unable to act upon it (Wiliam, 2011). For example, pupils’ responses to feedback can also vary depending on a range of social factors, including their age as well as the message the feedback contains. Realising this, Mr Jones needs to frame feedback in such a way as to ensure that pupils seek and welcome it, for example identifying specific strengths and encouraging pupils to keep up their effort in relation to these. Moreover, feedback should focus on improving pupils’ work, for example “remember to write formally in business letters: check and remove any abbreviations in formal writing”. In contrast, if it focuses on pupils’ personal strengths and weaknesses (“you’re usually good at writing letters”), this can lead them to worry more about how they are perceived by others than about how they can improve (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). He also needs to give them time and opportunities to act upon formative feedback, for example in the lesson after written feedback has been given.
Given the importance of these elements of feedback, Mr Jones realises he will need to be careful about his use of peer and self-generated feedback. If these strategies are to be effective, they need to meet the same criteria as any other feedback: offer specific guidance and encourage further effort. If they do not, they are likely to be ineffective.
In summary, feedback should:
Be specific.
Focus on immediate and subsequent improvements in work and effort.
Encourage pupils to act upon it.
4. Feedback needs to be sustainable for teachers
Mr Jones worries that providing detailed feedback could easily come to take up a huge amount of his time. He is reassured to learn that there is no specific evidence supporting the provision of extensive written feedback and very limited evidence about the effectiveness of written marking as a specific means of providing feedback (Gibson et al., 2015). Within the limits of his school’s marking and feedback policy, this frees him to provide the guidance that pupils need in the most efficient manner possible. He could work with colleagues to identify efficient approaches to marking and alternative approaches to feedback, for example, by giving pupils feedback through a model, through a verbal comment, or by providing feedback to the whole class. He should only record data from feedback when it is useful for improving pupil outcomes.
5. Feedback and self-regulation
Feedback can help pupils to take a greater role in their learning. Feedback allows pupils to better plan, monitor and evaluate their current performance and understanding. If pupils have a good grasp of their current performance and a clear sense of their goal, then they should increasingly be able to judge how well they are doing and regulate their learning by identifying what they need to do to improve.
Teachers can help by explicitly teaching pupils metacognitive strategies linked to subject knowledge – for example, by helping pupils to effectively plan, monitor and evaluate their writing through sharing what an effective final piece of writing looks like and modelling the thinking and steps undertaken to produce it. Teachers can then facilitate feedback on how effectively pupils have planned, monitored and evaluated their work: “You missed out step two in the plan. Make sure you select three pieces of evidence you are going to use in your essay”. This feedback develops pupil metacognition in relation to this particular task. These strategies can develop pupil independence and academic success (EEF, 2017).
6. Nuances and Caveats
Not all feedback is effective. Additional feedback may not support pupils to improve further: the crucial question when considering whether feedback is effective is whether it leads to the desired improvement. It is not about the quantity offered or the way it is delivered.
Feedback is just one way to help pupils improve: the priority is to teach effectively initially then to use feedback where pupils have struggled, rather than relying on feedback (Hattie and Timperley, 2007).
The evidence on feedback is sometimes inconclusive and even contradictory (Kluger & de Nisi, 1996). Mr Jones will need to adapt the guidance on effective feedback to suit the subject he is teaching and the needs of his class. It could be useful to speak to colleagues who teach the same subject about such adaptions.
Further Reading
Department for Education. (2016). Eliminating unnecessary workload around marking. bit.ly/ecf-dfe2
References
Department for Education. (2016). Eliminating unnecessary workload around marking. bit.ly/ecf-dfe2
Education Endowment Foundation (2017). Metacognition and Self-regulated learning Guidance Report. https://bit.ly/ecf-eef
Gibson, S., Oliver, L. & Dennison, M. (2015). Workload Challenge: Analysis of teacher consultation responses. Department for Education.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, Solution Tree Press.
Step 3: Reflect and Take Quiz
Key Takeaways
Mr Jones can help pupils to improve their work and deepen their understanding by:
offering feedback which guides pupils on how to improve and gives them the opportunity to apply it
making his approach to feedback efficient and sustainable for him
encouraging pupils to monitor and regulate their own learning
Reflect on the following questions
What did you see in this module that you already do or have seen in other classrooms?
What do you feel is the gap between your current practice and what you have seen in this module?
Which of the ‘key takeaways’ do you need to focus on? Where and when might you try to apply them to your teaching?